Lucas Herbert's eight-under 62 at Royal Birkdale on Friday did more than put the Australian on the brink of a major championship. It laid bare a tectonic shift in the sport's power structure, one that now stretches from the manicured fairways of Augusta to the sand traps of Dubai and the training academies of Islamabad.
Why this matters beyond the fairway
The score itself was historic: only five rounds of 62 had ever been recorded in a men's major before Herbert and Sam Burns matched that feat within minutes of each other. But the real significance lies in what the round represents. Herbert, a 30-year-old LIV Golf player, is part of a cohort that is redefining the economics of professional golf. LIV's infusion of Saudi capital has shattered the PGA Tour's monopoly, luring top players with guaranteed riches and reshaping the sport's global calendar. This isn't just about prize money, it's about control. The PGA Tour's traditional dominance, built over decades through exclusive broadcast deals and sponsorship networks, is now being contested in courtrooms and boardrooms as much as on the course. Herbert's surge at the British Open, a tournament still fiercely protected by the R&A, is a symbolic victory for the new order. It signals that the Saudi-backed circuit isn't just a financial disruptor; it's producing champions who can compete, and win, on golf's most hallowed stages.
For South Asia, where golf is a niche but growing sport, the implications are even sharper. The region's golf economy, from equipment manufacturers in Pakistan to academies in India and Bangladesh, is caught between two competing visions of the game's future. The PGA Tour's traditional model, built on prestige and exclusivity, is clashing with LIV's commercial dynamism. Which model will shape the next generation of South Asian golfers? And how will that choice influence the sport's development in a region where cricket still commands the lion's share of attention?
The players, the politics, and the prize
The British Open has long been the most tradition-bound of golf's majors, its links courses and historic clubs a bulwark against the modernizing forces reshaping the sport. Yet even here, the tectonic plates are shifting. The R&A, which runs the Open Championship, has so far resisted the Saudi-led LIV Golf's advances, maintaining its independence from the Saudi-backed circuit. But the presence of LIV players like Herbert, who plays on the Saudi-funded circuit, on the leaderboard at Royal Birkdale is a quiet rebuke to that resistance. The R&A's decision to allow LIV players to compete in its tournaments (while barring them from the Ryder Cup) is a pragmatic acknowledgment of the new reality: golf's future cannot be dictated by nostalgia alone.
The key actors in this drama are not just the players on the course but the institutions behind them. The PGA Tour, once the undisputed king of professional golf, is locked in a legal battle with LIV Golf over antitrust violations and player poaching. The R&A, meanwhile, is caught between its commitment to tradition and the commercial pressures of the modern game. Then there's the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF), the financial engine behind LIV Golf, which is using the sport as a tool of soft power, embedding its influence in global golf's most prestigious events. The British Open, with its 160-year history, is the latest battleground in this struggle.
Herbert's round of 62 was not just a personal triumph; it was a statement. By matching the record for the lowest round in a men's major, he proved that LIV Golf's players are not just mercenaries chasing paychecks, they are legitimate contenders capable of winning golf's most hallowed titles. His performance is a direct challenge to the PGA Tour's narrative that LIV Golf is a sideshow, a circus of aging stars chasing money at the expense of the game's soul. If Herbert goes on to win the Claret Jug, the PGA Tour's resistance to LIV Golf will look increasingly futile.
What happened on the course, and off it
According to reporting by Al Jazeera, Lucas Herbert's second-round 62 at the British Open was part of a surreal afternoon at Royal Birkdale, where two rounds of 62 were recorded within minutes of each other. Herbert, playing in the afternoon wave, birdied the first four holes and never looked back, finishing with a round that equalled the record for the lowest score in a men's major. His playing partner, Sam Burns, matched the feat with a round of his own, while Bryson DeChambeau, another LIV Golf star, fell victim to a bizarre two-shot penalty after treading down long grass in a rough lie, a decision that sparked animated discussions among rules officials and left DeChambeau visibly frustrated.
The drama extended beyond the course. DeChambeau's penalty, imposed for what the R&A deemed an improvement of his intended swing area, was a reminder of how even the smallest infractions can derail a major championship. The incident underscored the razor-thin margins that separate glory from ignominy in golf, where a single step in the wrong direction can cost a player millions in prize money and endorsements. Meanwhile, Herbert's demeanor after his round, his admission that he "felt like I kind of let everyone down" after missing a five-foot putt on the 18th, highlighted the psychological toll of the sport. Golf is a game of inches, but it's also a game of nerves, where the pressure to perform can crush even the most talented players.
The broader context is one of fragmentation. The PGA Tour and LIV Golf are now locked in a bitter rivalry, with players forced to choose sides in a high-stakes game of musical chairs. The British Open, traditionally a PGA Tour stronghold, has become a neutral ground where players from both circuits can compete, but not without controversy. The R&A's decision to allow LIV players to enter its tournaments has drawn criticism from some quarters, particularly in the United States, where the PGA Tour's influence is strongest. Yet the presence of LIV stars like Herbert and DeChambeau on the leaderboard at Royal Birkdale suggests that the sport's new order is here to stay.
Global and regional reaction: Who's cheering, who's jeering
The global reaction to Herbert's surge has been a mix of awe and unease. Golf's traditionalists have greeted his performance with a mixture of admiration and skepticism. Some have praised his skill and composure, while others have questioned whether his success is a sign of the sport's commercialization run amok. The PGA Tour, for its part, has remained tight-lipped, though its legal battles with LIV Golf suggest that it sees Herbert's rise as a direct threat to its dominance.
In the Middle East, where Saudi Arabia is investing heavily in sports as part of its Vision 2030 plan, Herbert's performance has been met with unbridled enthusiasm. The Saudi Public Investment Fund's backing of LIV Golf is part of a broader strategy to use sports as a tool of soft power, and Herbert's success is a validation of that approach. The fact that a non-American player, Herbert is Australian, has risen to prominence under the LIV banner is a bonus for Saudi Arabia, which is keen to present the circuit as a global, inclusive project rather than a purely American phenomenon.
In South Asia, the reaction has been more muted but no less significant. Golf in the region is still in its infancy, but the sport's growth has been fueled by a mix of corporate sponsorships, government initiatives, and the influence of expatriate communities. In Pakistan, for example, the Pakistan Golf Federation has been working to develop the sport at the grassroots level, with a focus on training academies and junior programs. The federation's efforts have borne fruit in recent years, with Pakistani golfers making inroads in regional tournaments. Herbert's success at the British Open is a reminder of the potential that exists in South Asia, and the challenges that remain.
The question for South Asian golf's stakeholders is whether they will align with the PGA Tour's traditional model or embrace the commercial dynamism of LIV Golf. The PGA Tour's global reach and prestige are undeniable, but LIV Golf's financial muscle and willingness to experiment with formats (such as team events and shorter tournaments) offer an alternative path. For a region where golf is still fighting for relevance, the choice could determine whether the sport remains a niche pursuit or becomes a mainstream phenomenon.
South Asia impact: The golf economy's fault line
For South Asia, Herbert's surge at the British Open is more than a sporting spectacle, it's a case study in how global power shifts in sports can reshape regional economies. Golf in South Asia has long been dominated by the PGA Tour's traditional model, with aspiring players looking to the United States for exposure and opportunities. But LIV Golf's rise is challenging that paradigm, offering an alternative pathway to success that is backed by deep pockets and a global vision. The question for Islamabad, Delhi, and Dhaka is whether they will double down on the PGA Tour's model or explore the opportunities presented by LIV Golf's commercial dynamism.
There's a historical parallel here that South Asian stakeholders would do well to consider. In 2019, the Pakistan Super League (PSL) revolutionized cricket in the region by offering a commercially viable alternative to the established cricket boards. The PSL's success proved that South Asia could carve out its own path in global sports, independent of traditional power structures. Golf is at a similar inflection point. The region's golf federations must decide whether to align with the PGA Tour's traditional model or explore the opportunities presented by LIV Golf's commercial dynamism. The choice will determine whether golf in South Asia remains a niche pursuit or becomes a mainstream phenomenon.
The economic stakes are high. Golf tourism is a growing industry in South Asia, with countries like Sri Lanka and the Maldives investing in world-class courses to attract international players. But the sport's development at the grassroots level is equally critical. If South Asian players can break into the top tiers of professional golf, whether through the PGA Tour or LIV Golf, they could inspire a new generation of golfers and attract investment to the region. Herbert's success is a reminder that talent is not confined to the traditional golfing powerhouses. With the right support, South Asian golfers could soon be making headlines of their own.
What happens next: The battle for golf's soul
The most immediate question is whether Herbert can maintain his momentum and win the British Open. If he does, it will be a seismic moment for golf, validating LIV Golf's business model and further eroding the PGA Tour's dominance. The PGA Tour's legal battles with LIV Golf are far from over, but a Herbert victory would shift the narrative in favor of the Saudi-backed circuit. It would also put pressure on the R&A to reconsider its stance on LIV Golf players, potentially opening the door for more Saudi-backed stars to compete in future Opens.
Beyond the Open, the broader battle for golf's future will play out on multiple fronts. The PGA Tour and LIV Golf are locked in a legal and financial struggle that could reshape the sport's governance for decades. The PGA Tour's recent merger with the European Tour (announced in 2022) was a defensive move to consolidate its power, but it has done little to slow LIV Golf's advance. Meanwhile, the R&A's decision to allow LIV players in its tournaments is a pragmatic acknowledgment of the new reality, but it risks alienating traditionalists who see the Saudi-backed circuit as a threat to the sport's soul.
For South Asia, the implications are twofold. First, the region's golf federations must decide whether to align with the PGA Tour's traditional model or explore the opportunities presented by LIV Golf. The PGA Tour's global reach and prestige are undeniable, but LIV Golf's financial muscle and willingness to experiment with formats offer an alternative path. Second, the region's golf academies must adapt to the new reality. If LIV Golf becomes the dominant force in professional golf, academies in Pakistan, India, and Bangladesh will need to tailor their programs to produce players who can compete in the Saudi-backed circuit's unique format, one that emphasizes shorter tournaments, team events, and commercial appeal.A key question is whether South Asian players will be able to break into the top tiers of professional golf in this new environment. The PGA Tour's feeder system, with its deep bench of minor-league tournaments, has long been the gold standard for developing talent. LIV Golf, by contrast, is still building its infrastructure, and its minor-league system is unproven. For South Asian golfers, the choice may come down to which circuit offers the best pathway to success. If LIV Golf can provide a faster route to the top, it could attract talent from the region that might otherwise have pursued the PGA Tour's traditional path.
The most likely outcome is a fragmented golf landscape, with the PGA Tour and LIV Golf coexisting uneasily for the foreseeable future. The PGA Tour's legal victories and traditional prestige will ensure its continued influence, but LIV Golf's financial muscle and global ambitions mean it will not go away quietly. The R&A, meanwhile, will continue to walk a tightrope, trying to balance tradition with the commercial realities of the modern game. For South Asia, the challenge will be to navigate this new landscape without being left behind.
Related Coverage
Middle East Conflict Analysis → — In-depth analysis, background context, and continuous updates on this developing story.
Key Takeaways
- Lucas Herbert's record-equalling 62 at the British Open is a symbolic victory for LIV Golf, challenging the PGA Tour's traditional dominance and exposing the sport's shifting power dynamics.
- South Asia's golf economy stands at a crossroads, with federations and academies forced to choose between the PGA Tour's traditional model and LIV Golf's commercial dynamism, a decision that could determine the sport's future in the region.
- The British Open's allowance of LIV players highlights the R&A's pragmatic shift, but the tournament's traditional prestige may soon clash with the realities of a fragmented golf landscape.




